[vc_row][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_single_image image=”3457″ img_size=”870×500″][vc_column_text]
ABSTRACT: The articles discussed in working group 3 dealt with specific aspects of clinical research. In this context, the literature reporting on survival and complication rates of implant-supported or implant-tooth supported restorations in longitudinal studies of at least 5 years were discussed. The second aspect dealt with the evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in clinical studies and the related index systems available. Finally, the third aspect discussed dealt with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A detailed appraisal of the available methodology was presented.
KEY WORDS: clinical research; complication rates; aesthetic outcomes; implant dentistry; patient-reported outcome measures; survival
[real3dflipbook id=”6″]
[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”15px”][easy-social-share buttons=”facebook,twitter,linkedin,print,mail” style=”icon”][vc_empty_space height=”15px”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/4″][stm_sidebar sidebar=”1742″][vc_empty_space height=”15px”][/vc_column][/vc_row]
